Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jesper De Jong vs Anton Matusevich Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jong vs Matusevich analysis and find out who is favored!
Jesper De Jong vs Anton Matusevich Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jong 1 - 0 Matusevich
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jong has won 49.91% of points on their second serve, while Matusevich has won 50.68%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jong, in recent form, has won 50.64% of their opponent's second serve points, while Matusevich has won 47.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.68% and 32.71% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jong has saved 61.54% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Matusevich has saved 58.24% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jong has won 59.65% of matches played (W/L 34/ 23), with Matusevich winning 62.26% (W/L 33/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 80/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6). Matusevich has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 42/ 24), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Jong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.61% of matches (W/L 20/ 13), where as Matusevich has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 28/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jong winning 1 times and Matusevich being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Jong winning 2 and Matusevich winning 1. The last match between Jong and Matusevich was at the M25 Sunderland, 28-02-2020, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Jesper De Jong getting the victory 6-7(9) 7-6(2) 7-6(5).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:50:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jong and Matusevich have played a deciding set 1 times, with Jong winning 1 times and Matusevich 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Jong winning 2, and Matusevich 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jong has played against opponents with an average rank of 318.49 while Matusevich has played against players with an average rank of 248.02.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jong has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Matusevich has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jong has converted 47.66% of breakpoint opportunities, and Matusevich has converted 32.09% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
176
Rank
135
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
446
Rank
388
High
23
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
63% (225-135)
Career Total W/L
62% (138-86)
60% (21-14)
YTD W/L
56% (9-7)
$430,415
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jong VS Matusevich H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Jesper De Jong | Anton Matusevich |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 20 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 17 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:50:0 | 2:50:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (88/131) | 60% (86/144) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (66/88) | 73% (63/86) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (24/43) | 48% (28/58) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (53/144) | 31% (41/131) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Jong VS Matusevich H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(9) 7-6(2) 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Jesper De Jong
Player
Anton Matusevich
67%
(
88 of
131)
1st Serve %
60%
(
86 of
144)
17
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
6
75%
(
66 of
88)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
63 of
86)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
41 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
53 of
144)
143
Total Points Won
132
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jesper De Jong | Anton Matusevich |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (21/14) | 56% (9/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (49/38) | 58% (22/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (431/384) | 52% (197/181) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 70% (7/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 61% (14/9) | 71% (5/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 44% (4/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.45 | 0.58 |
| Aces Total | 179 | 108 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 99 | 55 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:46 | 1:45:47 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 316.11 | 321.94 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1549/2639) | 58% (688/1178) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (1094/1549) | 74% (508/688) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (544/1090) | 52% (253/490) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (112/235) | 34% (42/124) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (1014/2544) | 38% (471/1249) |
| Slam W/L | 80% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (12/9) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (8/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (17/29) | 56% (9/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 33% (2/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (19/18) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (19/1) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 19% (16/3) | 25% (8/2) |
Jesper De Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Jesper De Jong
70%
(
78 of
112)
1st Serve %
58%
(
72 of
124)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
40%
(
45 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
61 of
124)
128
Total Points Won
108
|
6-3 6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jack Draper
50%
(
77 of
154)
1st Serve %
50%
(
75 of
149)
11
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
9
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
52%
(
40 of
77)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
90%
(
9 of
10)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
37%
(
57 of
154)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
60 of
149)
157
Total Points Won
146
|
7-5 6-4 6-7(3) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jeff Wolf
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
41%
(
18 of
44)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Dennis Novak
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Jesper De Jong
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
49%
(
45 of
92)
8
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
31 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jesper De Jong
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
70%
(
30 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jurij Rodionov
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
45%
(
40 of
89)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
47 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Francesco Passaro
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
75%
(
81 of
108)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
35 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Anton Matusevich Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Neil Oberleitner
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
101)
8
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
28 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
101)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Patrick Zahraj
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Anton Matusevich
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
9
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
78%
(
25 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
29%
(
28 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
5-7 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Julio Cesar Porras
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
85%
(
61 of
72)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Noah Lopez
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
19 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Andres Fernandez Canovas
56%
(
62 of
111)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
5
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
4
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
41%
(
20 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
50 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
107
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Anton Matusevich
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
44%
(
27 of
62)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Anton Matusevich
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
11
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
38 of
44)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Mark Whitehouse
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
5
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
6
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Fabien Salle
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
22 of
35)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
19 of
22)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
77%
(
10 of
13)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
17%
(
6 of
35)
39
Total Points Won
37
|
7-6(3) 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Jong Vs Matusevich Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Anton Matusevich
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
